This sprint: The Invitation · Proof · Questions

Nothing attached. Pull one from the vault.

• QuestionsWhy should I use you instead of another vendor — or DIY?The most important question, even when never said out loud. Content angle: David vs Goliath (out-recruited three bigger competitors combined), a decade of scar tissue, and trust that is checked, not claimed.unused
• QuestionsHow will I know how the recruit is progressing?Clients want visibility: screened, qualified, scheduled, confirmed, replacements, quota status. Content angle: the 3 PM update rule — great client service is letting someone leave work without wondering if their project is on fire.unused
• QuestionsCan you handle really difficult or unusual criteria?Specific job titles, technologies used, diagnoses, purchase behavior, company size, decision-making authority. Content angle: detective-work recruiting — LA Fitness, Roblox library, the impossible three.unused
• QuestionsHow do you make sure participants actually show up?No-shows wreck qualitative studies, especially expensive executives, physicians, niche professionals. Content angle: confirmation cadence, community trust, and recruiting the right person in the first place — show rates start at the screener.unused
• QuestionsWhere are you finding these participants?Database? LinkedIn? Social? Associations? Purchased lists? Referrals? Direct outreach? Content angle: behind-the-scenes sourcing story — there is no magic panel; identify where the humans actually live, work, and gather.unused
• QuestionsHow much is this going to cost?And specifically: cost per recruit, incentive, project management fee, additional sourcing costs. Content angle: the hidden cost of bad recruits and failed studies — you can save $200 on recruiting and lose $2M on the decision.unused
• QuestionsWhat happens if recruiting starts falling behind?Clients want to know how fast you identify problems, adjust sourcing, and rescue the recruit. Content angle: Rescue Recruit stories — the calls nobody wants to receive, 47 of 50 and everybody panicking.unused
• QuestionsHow quickly can you recruit this project?Usually followed by: 'Can you have people ready by next week?' Content angle: speed as a byproduct of knowing where to look (voter study in 41 minutes), plus the honest incidence math behind any timeline.unused
• QuestionsHow do you verify participants are really who they say they are?Clients increasingly worry about fraud, professional respondents, AI-generated answers, and bad data. Content angle: human verification / fraud content — walk the verification chain, trust is checked not claimed.unused
• QuestionsCan you actually find the people we need?The first question on every niche, B2B, healthcare, high-income, or hard-to-reach recruit. Content angle: the Impossible Recruit Challenge — answer with the hardest-three story and how hunting beats pulling sample.unused
• The InvitationBring me your impossible recruitThe standing invitation: if your vendor is at 47 of 50 and everybody is panicking, that's when it gets interesting around here. DM me or book a call.unused
• ProofA decade of scar tissueREAL NUMBERS (confirmed by Jim, Aug 2026): 10 years in business. Over 2,000 studies/projects completed. $5 million+ paid out in participant incentives. 300,000+ people in the panel and growing. The advantage of 10 years isn't the anniversary. It's the scar tissue. Hooks: 'You don't learn respondent fraud from a PowerPoint. You learn it after 2,000 projects.' / '$5 million in incentives paid teaches you exactly where humans lie and where systems break.'unused
• ProofVoter study filled in 41 minutesWe filled a voter study in 41 minutes. Speed as a byproduct of knowing where to look.unused
• ProofOutproduced three bigger competitors combinedSamsung recruit: client added three much larger vendors; we out-recruited all three combined. [Pull exact numbers from the project file before using in a post.]unused